Virtual monochromatic images for coronary artery imaging with a spectral photon-counting CT in comparison to dual-layer CT systems: a phantom and a preliminary human study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) from spectral photon-counting CT (SPCCT) and two energy-integrating detector dual-energy CT (EID-DECT) scanners from the same manufacturer, for the coronary lumen. METHODS: A 21-cm section of the Mercury v4.0 phantom was scanned using a cardiac CT protocol. VMIs from 40 to 90 keV were reconstructed using high-resolution (HR) parameters for EID-DECT and SPCCT (CB and HRB kernels at 0.67 mm slice thickness, respectively). Ultra-high-resolution (UHR) parameters were used in addition to SPCCT (detailed-2 kernel, 0.43 mm slice thickness). Noise-power-spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF), and detectability index (d') were computed for 2-mm-diameter lumen detection. In consensus, two radiologists analyzed the quality of the images from 8 patients who underwent coronary CTA on both CT systems. RESULTS: For all keV images, fpeak, f50, and d' were higher with SPCCT. The fpeak and f50 were higher with UHR-SPCCT with greater noise and lower d' compared to those of the HR-SPCCT images. Noise magnitude was constant for all energy levels (keV) with both systems, and lower with HR images, and d' decreased as keV decreased. Subjective analysis showed greater lumen sharpness and overall quality for HR and UHR-SPCCT images using all keV, with a greater difference at low keV compared to HR-EID-DECT images. CONCLUSION: HR and UHR-SPCCT images gave greater detectability of the coronary lumen for 40 to 90 keV VMIs compared to two EID-DECT systems, with benefits of higher lumen sharpness and overall quality. KEY POINTS: • Compared with 2 dual-energy CT systems, spectral photon-counting CT (SPCCT) improved spatial resolution, noise texture, noise magnitude, and detectability of the coronary lumen. • Use of ultra-high-resolution parameters with SPCCT improved spatial resolution and noise texture and provided high detectability of the coronary lumen, despite an increase in noise magnitude. • In eight patients, radiologists found greater overall image quality with SPCCT for all virtual monochromatic images with a greater difference at low keV, compared with dual-energy CT systems.

Patient specific evaluation of breathing motion induced interplay effects.

PURPOSE: In lung SABR, interplay between target motion and dynamically changing beam parameters can affect the target coverage. To identify the potential need for motion-management techniques, a comprehensive methodology for pre-treatment estimation of interplay effects has been implemented. METHODS: In conjunction with an alpha-version of VeriSoft and OCTAVIUS 4D (PTW-Freiburg, Germany), a method is presented to calculate a virtual, motion-simulated 3D dose distribution based on measurement data acquired in a stationary phantom and a subsequent correction with time-dependent target-motion patterns. In-house software has been developed to create user-defined motion patterns based on either simplistic or real patient-breathing patterns including the definition of the exact beam starting phase. The approach was validated by programmed couch and phantom motion during beam delivery. Five different breathing traces with extremely altered beam-on phases (0 % and 50 % respiratory phase) and a superior-inferior motion altitude of 25 mm were used to probe the influence of interplay effects for 14 lung SABR plans. Gamma analysis (2 %/2mm) was used for quantification. RESULTS: Validation measurements resulted in >98 % pass rates. Regarding the interplay effect evaluation, gamma pass rates of <92 % were observed for sinusoidal breathing patterns with <25 number of breaths per delivery time (NBs) and realistic patterns with <18 NBs. CONCLUSION: The potential influence of interplay effects on the target coverage is highly dependent on the patient's breathing behaviour. The presented moving-platform-free approach can be used for verification of ITV-based treatment plans to identify whether the clinical goals are achievable without explicit use of a respiratory management technique.

Coronary CT Angiography with Photon-counting CT: First-In-Human Results.

Background Spatial resolution, soft-tissue contrast, and dose-efficient capabilities of photon-counting CT (PCCT) potentially allow a better quality and diagnostic confidence of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in comparison to conventional CT. Purpose To compare the quality of CCTA scans obtained with a clinical prototype PCCT system and an energy-integrating detector (EID) dual-layer CT (DLCT) system. Materials and Methods In this prospective board-approved study with informed consent, participants with coronary artery disease underwent retrospective electrocardiographically gated CCTA with both systems after injection of 65-75 mL of 400 mg/mL iodinated contrast agent at 5 mL/sec. A prior phantom task-based quality assessment of the detectability index of coronary lesions was performed. Ultra-high-resolution parameters were used for PCCT (1024 matrix, 0.25-mm section thickness) and EID DLCT (512 matrix, 0.67-mm section thickness). Three cardiac radiologists independently performed a blinded analysis using a five-point quality score (1 = insufficient, 5 = excellent) for overall image quality, diagnostic confidence, and diagnostic quality of calcifications, stents, and noncalcified plaques. A logistic regression model, adjusted for radiologists, was used to evaluate the proportion of improvement in scores with the best method. Results Fourteen consecutive participants (12 men; mean age, 61 years ± 17) were enrolled. Scores of overall quality and diagnostic confidence were higher with PCCT images with a median of 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 2) and 5 (IQR, 1) versus 4 (IQR, 1) and 4 (IQR, 3) with EID DLCT images, using a mean tube current of 255 mAs ± 0 versus 349 mAs ± 111 for EID DLCT images (P < .01). Proportions of improvement with PCCT images for quality of calcification, stent, and noncalcified plaque were 100%, 92% (95% CI: 71, 98), and 45% (95% CI: 28, 63), respectively. In the phantom study, detectability indexes were 2.3-fold higher for lumen and 2.9-fold higher for noncalcified plaques with PCCT images. Conclusion Coronary CT angiography with a photon-counting CT system demonstrated in humans an improved image quality and diagnostic confidence compared with an energy-integrating dual-layer CT. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Sandfort and Bluemke in this issue.

First In-Human Results of Computed Tomography Angiography for Coronary Stent Assessment With a Spectral Photon Counting Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare the image quality of in vivo coronary stents between an energy integrating detectors dual-layer computed tomography (EID-DLCT) and a clinical prototype of spectral photon counting computed tomography (SPCCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In January to June 2021, consecutive patients with coronary stents were prospectively enrolled to undergo a coronary computed tomography (CT) with an EID-DLCT (IQon, Philips) and an SPCCT (Philips). The study was approved by the local ethical committee and patients signed an informed consent. A retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated acquisition was performed with optimized matching parameters on the 2 scanners (EID-DLCT: collimation, 64 × 0.625 mm; kVp, 120, automatic exposure control with target current at 255 mAs; rotation time, 0.27 seconds; SPCCT: collimation, 64 × 0.275 mm; kVp, 120; mAs, 255; rotation time, 0.33 seconds). The injection protocol was the same on both scanners: 65 to 75 mL of Iomeron (Bracco) at 5 mL/s. Images were reconstructed with slice thickness of 0.67 mm, 512 matrix, XCB (Xres cardiac standard) and XCD (Xres cardiac detailed) kernel, iDose 3 for EID-DLCT and 0.25-mm slice thickness, 1024 matrix, Detailed 2 and Sharp kernel, and iDose 6 for SPCCT. Two experienced observers measured the proximal and distal external and internal diameters of the stents to quantify blooming artifacts. Regions of interest were drawn in the lumen of the stent and of the upstream coronary artery. The difference (Δ S-C) between the respective attenuation values was calculated as a quantification of stent-induced artifacts on intrastent image quality. For subjective image quality, 3 experienced observers graded with a 4-point scale the image quality of different parameters: coronary wall before the stent, stent lumen, stent structure, calcifications surrounding the stent, and beam-hardening artifacts. RESULTS: Eight patients (age, 68 years [interquartile range, 8]; all men; body mass index, 26.2 kg/m2 [interquartile range, 4.2]) with 16 stents were scanned. Five stents were not evaluable owing to motion artifacts on the SPCCT. Of the remaining, all were drug eluting stents, of which 6 were platinum-chromium, 3 were cobalt-platinum-iridium, and 1 was stainless steel. For 1 stent, no information could be retrieved. Radiation dose was lower with the SPCCT (fixed CT dose index of 25.7 mGy for SPCCT vs median CT dose index of 35.7 [IQ = 13.6] mGy; P = 0.02). For 1 stent, the internal diameter was not assessable on EID-DLCT. External diameters were smaller and internal diameters were larger with SPCCT (all P < 0.05). Consequently, blooming artifacts were reduced on SPCCT (P < 0.05). Whereas Hounsfield unit values within the coronary arteries on the 2 scanners were similar, the Δ S-C was lower for SPCCT-Sharp as compared with EID-DLCT-XCD and SPCCT-Detailed 2 (P < 0.05). The SPCCT received higher subjective scores than EID-DLCT for stent lumen, stent structure, surrounding calcifications and beam-hardening for both Detailed 2 and Sharp (all P ≤ 0.05). The SPCCT-Sharp was judged better for stent structure and beam-hardening assessment as compared with SPCCT-Detailed 2. CONCLUSION: Spectral photon counting CT demonstrated improved objective and subjective image quality as compared with EID-DLCT for the evaluation of coronary stents even with a reduced radiation dose.